cl_maintenanceAndUpdateFrequency

RI_543

1350 record(s)
 
Type of resources
Available actions
Topics
Keywords
Contact for the resource
Provided by
Formats
Representation types
Update frequencies
status
Resolution
From 1 - 10 / 1350
  • Categories  

    This map of the total magnetic field was derived from data acquired during an aeromagnetic survey carried out by EON Geosciences Inc. during the period between April 12, 2010 to June 2, 2010. The data were recorded using a split-beam cesium vapour magnetometer (sensitivity = 0.005 nT) mounted in the tail boom of a Piper Navajo aircraft. The nominal traverse and control line spacings were, respectively, 800 m and 2 400 m, and the aircraft flew at a nominal terrain clearance of 250 m. Traverse lines were oriented N45°E with orthogonal control lines. The flight path was recovered following post-flight differential corrections to the raw Global Positioning System data and inspection of ground images recorded by a vertically-mounted video camera. The survey was flown on a pre-determined flight surface to minimize differences in magnetic values at the intersections of control and traverse lines. These differences were computer-analysed to obtain a mutually levelled set of flight-line magnetic data. The levelled values were then interpolated to a 200 m grid. The International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF) was not removed from the magnetic field.

  • Categories  

    This map of the total magnetic field was derived from data acquired during an aeromagnetic survey carried out by EON Geosciences Inc. in the period between April 10, 2009 and September 16, 2009. The data were recorded using split-beam cesium vapour magnetometers (sensitivity =0.005 nT) mounted in each of the tail booms of a Piper Navajo and a Cessna 206 aircraft. The nominal traverse and control line spacings were, respectively, 800 m and 2 400 m, and the aircraft flew at a nominal terrain clearance of 250 m. Traverse lines were oriented N90°E with orthogonal control lines. The flight path was recovered following post-flight differential corrections to the raw Global Positioning System data and inspection of ground images recorded by a vertically-mounted video camera. The survey was flown on a pre-determined flight surface to minimize differences in magnetic values at the intersections of control and traverse lines. These differences were computer-analysed to obtain a mutually levelled set of flight-line magnetic data. The levelled values were then interpolated to a 200 m grid. The International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF) was not removed from the magnetic field.

  • Categories  

    Ferry Terminals

  • Categories  

    This aeromagnetic survey was carried out by Goldak Airborne Surveys from February 17, 2014 to March 21, 2014. The data were collected using split-beam cesium vapour magnetometers mounted in each of the tail booms of 2 Piper Navajo aircraft. Nominal traverse and control line spacings were 400 and 1400 m, and the nominal terrain clearance was 125 m.

  • Categories  

    This polygon dataset was created to provide a record of the designated Provincial Waterways in Manitoba. This database contains lines and polygons showing the locations of provincial waterways, such as drains, diversions, detention basins, floodways, dams and reservoirs. This dataset was created by digitizing high-resolution imagery of the water features and by digitizing the titled Water Control Work plans associated with the features for drains which have been designated as provincial waterways by Order-in-Council.This dataset was created to provide a record of the designated Provincial Waterways in Manitoba and was intended for use in administering Provincial Waterways Authorizations. Provincial Waterways are designated by Order-in-Council and are under the administration and control of Manitoba Infrastructure (MI) through the Water Resource Administration Act.

  • Categories  

    not_specified

  • Categories  

    not_specified

  • Categories  

    This map of the residual total magnetic field was derived from data acquired during an aeromagnetic survey carried out by Goldak Airborne Surveys during the period May 16, 2009 to July 1, 2009. The data were recorded using a split-beam cesium vapour magnetometer mounted in the tail boom of a Piper Navajo aircraft. The nominal traverse and control line spacings were 400 m and 2400 m, respectively, and the aircraft flew at a nominal terrain clearance of 150 m.

  • Categories  

    not_specified

  • Categories  

    # #Archive data from the 2018 Hydroclimatic Atlas ## #Description The Hydroclimatic Atlas describes the current and future water regime in southern Quebec in order to support the implementation of water management practices that are resilient to climate change. ## #Avertissement The 2018 version of the Atlas is now replaced by a more recent version on the website. Data from the 2018 version is archived on Data Québec for reference, for example for old reports or analyses referring to this version of the data. Any new study or analysis should use the most recent data available on [Data Quebec (Hydroclimatic Atlas 2022)] (https://www.donneesquebec.ca/recherche/dataset/atlas-hydroclimatique-2022) or on the Atlas website (www.cehq.gouv.qc.ca/atlas-hydroclimate-). ## #Liste data available * Map of river sections from the Hydroclimatic Atlas with their attributes (available in GeoJSON and shapefile format). * The CSV tables (“Magnitude...”) for each of the 28 hydrological indicators describing the __ampliture__ and the __direction__ for RCP4.5 and RCP8.5, for the three future horizons (see documentation for details). * The CSV tables (“Projected Indicator...”) for each of the 28 hydrological indicators detailing the flow values with their uncertainty for the historical period and the three future horizons (RCP4.5 and 8.5). See documentation for more details. * A more detailed [PDF with metadata and description] (https://www.donneesquebec.ca/recherche/dataset/atlas-hydroclimatique-2018/resource/7af10f58-75a0-4839-b9f0-2b9728cb447d) of the data.**This third party metadata element was translated using an automated translation tool (Amazon Translate).**