Proposed Protected and Conservation Areas in the NWT

Coal Exploration Licences

Prospecting Permits

Ts’udé Nilįné Tuyeta Established Protected Area

NWT Species at Risk Data

The dataset is a compilation of the boundaries of the 19 NWT Electoral Districts based upon the 2012 Electoral Boundary Commission and the legal descriptions found in Bill 18 of Fifth Session, Seventeenth Legislative Assembly plus any Polling Divisions within each Electoral District as determined by Elections NWT.

Canadian Homogenized Surface Air Temperature – Version 3.1 (CanHomT V3.1) This dataset is an update of the Third Generation Homogenized Temperature dataset (Vincent et al. (2020), extended through 2023. It was developed for climate trend analysis and includes long-term daily maximum, minimum, and mean temperature series for 780 stations (776 locations) in Canada. The key enhancement in V3.1 is the inclusion of both Original and Adjusted data, together with their associated data flags and the source station climate ID, providing improved traceability, reproducibility, and transparency. Key processing steps include: • Merging observations from nearby sites to create long records • Quality control of data • Adjusting daily minimum temperatures since July 1961 for the observing-time (climatological day definition) change at 96 principal stations (Vincent et al., 2009) • Detecting non-climatic shifts in annual and seasonal average temperature data series using homogeneity tests with reference and station metadata. • Applying Quantile-Matching (QM) adjustments with reference data (including parallel observations) to correct non-climatic changes (Vincent et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2010). Parallel observations —simultaneous measurements from old and new instruments or locations—were used whenever available because they provide the most reliable basis for data homogenization. Adjustments made without suitable reference data carry greater uncertainty, and this increased uncertainty should be quantified and clearly communicated (WMO, 2020). The QM method adjusts the entire distribution of data in one segment to match another (Wang et al., 2026; Vincent et al., 2018; Wang & Feng, 2013; Wang et al. 2010), ensuring that distribution changes—including variance shifts—at identified changepoints are homogenized. The gridded version of monthly CanHomT V3.1, called CanGridT mlyV3.1 [https://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/781e02cc-6c1b-462e-b61b-f96c607b23bd], was found to represent Canada’s warming trend reasonably well since 1900, despite changes in data availability over time (Wang et al., 2026, see their Figure S3). References Vincent, L.A., M.M. Hartwell and X.L. Wang, 2020: A Third Generation of Homogenized Temperature for Trend Analysis and Monitoring Changes in Canada’s Climate. Atmosphere-Ocean, 58(3), 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/07055900.2020.1765728. Vincent, L.A., E.J. Milewska, R. Hopkinson and L. Malone, 2009: Bias in minimum temperature introduced by a redefinition of the climatological day at the Canadian synoptic stations. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol, 48, 2160-2168. DOI: 10.1175/2009JAMC2191.1. Vincent, L.A., E.J. Milewska, X. L. Wang, and M. M. Hartwell, 2018. Uncertainty in homogenized daily temperatures and derived indices of extremes illustrated using parallel observations in Canada, Intl. J. Climatol., 38:2, 692-707. DOI: 10.1002/JOC.5203. Wang, X. L. and Y. Feng, published online July 2013: RHtestsV4 User Manual. Climate Research Division, Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment Canada. 28 pp. [Available online at https://github.com/ECCC-CDAS] DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17309.17125. Wang, X. L., H. Chen, Y. Wu, Y. Feng, and Q. Pu, 2010: New techniques for detection and adjustment of shifts in daily precipitation data series. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 49, 2416-2436. DOI: 10.1175/2010JAMC2376.1. WMO. (2020). Guidelines on Homogenization (2020 edition). World Meteorological Organization. WMO-No. 1245. https://library.wmo.int/records/item/57130-guidelines-on-homogenization?offset=1. Wang, X. L., Feng, Y., Zwiers, F. W., & Cheng, V. Y. S. (2026). Precipitation trends in version 2 of the Canadian homogenized monthly precipitation dataset. Atmosphere-Ocean, 1–16, https://doi.org/10.1080/07055900.2026.2617861.

Canadian Homogenized Precipitation – Version 2 (CanHomP V2) The CanHomP V2 datasets were developed for climate trend analysis and include long-term monthly and daily precipitation series for 425 stations across Canada (Wang et al., 2026; Wang & Feng, 2026). Key improvements in Version 2 over its predecessor, CanHomPmlyV1 (Wang et al., 2023), include: • Expanded and improved source datasets, incorporating adjusted data from automated gauge stations and the Collaborative Rain, Hail and Snow (CoCoRaHS) network (https://www.cocorahs.org/canada.aspx) for recent decades. • Additional quality control procedures to remove false zeros in station data records for data-sparse regions or periods. • Enhanced changepoint detection, including tests on both untransformed and log-transformed data, and improved methods for identifying station-joining and variance inhomogeneities. • Use of more complete metadata for better accuracy. • Improved adjustment procedures to eliminate inhomogeneity by adjusting untransformed data series. • Development of homogenized daily precipitation series consistent with corresponding monthly totals (Wang & Feng, 2026). Key processing steps for both V1 and V2 include: • Merging observations from nearby sites to create long records, primarily using updated Adjusted Daily Rainfall and Snowfall data corrected for known issues such as unrealistic snow-water equivalent conversion, gauge wetting loss, and wind-induced undercatch (Wang et al., 2017). • Infilling data gaps using advanced spatial modeling of available data for the gap period. • Comprehensive quality control of data (Cheng et al., 2024). • Detecting non-climatic shifts using homogeneity tests with reference and station metadata. • Using up to four best neighbor stations as references, along with data derived from advanced spatial modeling of adjusted precipitation (MacDonald et al., 2021) and the Twentieth Century Reanalysis (20CRv3) ensemble-mean series of monthly precipitation (Slivinski et al., 2019). • Applying Quantile-Matching (QM) adjustments without reference data to correct non-climatic changes (Wang et al., 2026; Wang et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2010). Wang et al. (2023) also developed a dynamic QM adjustment method that uses the most strongly correlated homogeneous segment of nearby station data as a reference. They found that when station density is too low to identify suitable reference stations, adjustments without a reference could perform better than those with one, although results are similar for most stations. This approach may not be applicable to precipitation datasets with much higher station density or to variables with greater spatial coherence (e.g., surface air temperature). The QM method adjusts the entire distribution of data in one segment to match another (Wang et al., 2026; Wang et al., 2023; Wang & Feng, 2013; Wang et al., 2010), ensuring that distribution changes—including variance shifts—at identified changepoints are homogenized. Differences from AHCCD adjusted precipitation data • CanHomP V2: Adjusted, gap-filled, homogenized monthly and daily precipitation data for 425 core stations for the period up to 2023. • AHCCD adjusted precipitation: Adjusted but unhomogenized monthly and daily precipitation data for 464 manual stations for the period up to 2012 (Mekis & Vincent, 2011). References Wang, X. L., Feng, Y., Zwiers, F. W., & Cheng, V. Y. S. (2026). Precipitation trends in version 2 of Canadian homogenized monthly precipitation dataset. Atmosphere-Ocean, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/07055900.2026.2617861. Wang, X. L., & Feng, Y. (2026). Observed trends in precipitation extreme indices as inferred from a homogenized daily precipitation dataset for Canada. Weather and Climate Extremes, 51, 100860. https://authors.elsevier.com/sd/article/S2212-0947(26)00011-3. Wang, X.L, Y. Feng, V. Y. S. Cheng, H. Xu, 2023: Observed precipitation trends inferred from Canada’s homogenized monthly precipitation dataset, J. Clim., 36, 7957-7971. DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-23-0193.1. Wang, X. L., H. Xu, B. Qian, Y. Feng, E. Mekis, 2017: The adjusted daily rainfall and snowfall data for Canada. Atmos.-Ocean, 55:3, 155-168, DOI:10.1080/07055900.2017.1342163. Cheng, V. Y. S., Wang, X.L., and Y. Feng, 2024: A quality control system for historical in situ precipitation data. Atmosphere-Ocean, 62(4), 271-287, https://doi.org/10.1080/07055900.2024.2394836. Wang, X. L. and Y. Feng, published online July 2013: RHtestsV4 User Manual. Climate Research Division, Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment Canada. 28 pp. [Available online at https://github.com/ECCC-CDAS] DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17309.17125. Wang, X. L., H. Chen, Y. Wu, Y. Feng, and Q. Pu, 2010: New techniques for detection and adjustment of shifts in daily precipitation data series. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 49, 2416-2436. DOI: 10.1175/2010JAMC2376.1. MacDonald, H., D. W. McKenney, X. L. Wang, J. Pedlar, P. Papadopol, K. Lawrence, M. F. Hutchinson, 2021: Spatial Models of adjusted precipitation for Canada at varying time scales. J. Appl. Meteor. And Climatol., 60, 291-304. DOI: 10.1175/JAMC-D-20-0041.1. Slivinski, L. and coauthors, 2019: Towards a more reliable historical reanalysis: Improvements for version 3 of the Twentieth Century Reanalysis system. Q. J. R. Meteor. Soc., 2876-2908, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3598. Mekis, E., & Vincent, L. A. (2011). An overview of the second generation adjusted daily precipitation dataset for trend analysis in Canada. Atmosphere-Ocean, 49, 163–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/07055900.2011.583910.

This dataset displays the geographic areas within which critical habitat (CH) for terrestrial species at risk, listed on Schedule 1 of the federal Species at Risk Act (SARA), occurs in Canada. Note that this includes only terrestrial species and species for which Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) and Parks Canada Agency (PCA) lead. Under SARA, critical habitat is “the habitat that is necessary for the survival or recovery of a listed wildlife species and that is identified as the species’ critical habitat in the recovery strategy or action plan for the species.” To precisely define what constitutes critical habitat for a particular species it is essential that this geospatial information be considered in conjunction with complementary information provided in a species’ recovery document. Recovery documents are available from the Species at Risk (SAR) Public Registry (https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/species-risk-public-registry.html) for two posting stages (proposed and final posting). The recovery documents contain important information about the interpretation of the geospatial information, especially regarding the biological and environmental features (“biophysical attributes”) that complete the definition of a species’ critical habitat. Within any defined critical habitat geospatial boundary, not all of the area is necessarily critical habitat. It is important to note that recovery planning documents (and, therefore, critical habitat) may be amended from time to time as new information becomes available, which may occur after a document has been posted as proposed or final on the SAR Public Registry. The SAR Public Registry should always be considered as the main source for critical habitat information. In cases where the data are sensitive, the geographic area within which critical habitat occurs may be represented as grids. These are coarse grids (1, 10, 50 or 100 square kilometres) that serve as indicators to locate critical habitat in the recovery planning document. More detailed information on critical habitat may be made available on a need-to-know basis by contacting Environment and Climate Change Canada – Canadian Wildlife Service at ec.planificationduretablissement-recoveryplanning.ec@canada.ca. The data is current as of the date of the most recent revision.