Location of public transport stops in the City of Rimouski (Citébus and Taxibus) as well as Citébus circuits.**This third party metadata element was translated using an automated translation tool (Amazon Translate).**

A Conservation Unit (CU) is a group of wild Pacific salmon sufficiently isolated from other groups that, if extirpated, is very unlikely to recolonize naturally within an acceptable timeframe, such as a human lifetime or a specified number of salmon generations. Holtby and Ciruna (2007) provided a framework for aggregating the five species of salmon (genus Oncorhynchus) found on Canada’s Pacific coast into species-specific CUs based on three primary characteristics: ecotypology, life history and genetics. The first stage in the description of the Conservation Units is based solely on ecology. The ecotypologies used in this framework include a combined characterization of both freshwater and near-shore marine environments, and is termed “joint adaptive zone”. The second stage of the description involves the use of life history, molecular genetics, and further ecological characterizations to group and partition the first stage units into the final Conservation Units. The result is CUs that are described through the joint application of all three axes. It is important to note that CUs are distinct from other aggregates of Pacific salmon, such as designatable units (DUs) under the Species at Risk Act or management units (MUs). CU Counting Sites: Salmon spawner enumeration data in the Pacific Region is stored and managed in the New Salmon Escapement Database (NuSEDS). The term “escapement” is used to refer to the group of mature salmon that have ‘escaped’ from various sources of exploitation, and returned to freshwater to spawn and reproduce. This data is assigned to a “Counting Site”, which may be a complete watercourse with a marine terminus, a tributary to a larger watercourse, or a defined reach within a watercourse that may or may not encompass the entire population but represents an index of the abundance of that population. CU Status: CUs form the basic unit for assessment under Canada’s Policy for the Conservation of Wild Salmon Policy (WSP) (DFO 2005). The biological status of a CU is evaluated using a number of metrics (Holt et al. 2009; Holt 2009), which indicate a WSP status zone: Red (poor status), Amber (marginal status), or Green (healthy status). A final step then incorporates all metric and status-related information into a final integrated status for each CU, along with expert commentary to support the final status determination (e.g., DFO 2012; DFO 2016). This information is used as inputs to fisheries management processes to help prioritize assessment activities and management actions. Note: CU boundaries were reviewed in 2020-2021 and have been updated from the BC Freshwater Atlas 1:50,000 scale to the BC Freshwater Atlas 1:20,000 scale. The CU boundaries were last updated in March 2023. Please be aware that CUs may be reviewed and are subject to change without notice. Please refer to Conservation Unit Review Requests-Form and Summary for a list of CU review requests that are ongoing or have been finalized.

All manmade waterbodies, including reservoirs and canals, for the province

Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) has been conducting surface water trawl surveys since 1992 in the coastal waters of British Columbia, Washington, Oregon and Alaska and in the high seas of the Gulf of Alaska. These surveys initially focused on determining the migratory patterns (1992-2002) and on the growth and physiology (2003-2016) of juvenile Pacific Salmon. Data collected in shelf and slope waters at depths less than 400 meters off Washington and Oregon State are part of this larger survey series, but are limited to 1999-2001. These surveys focused on determining the migratory patterns of juvenile Pacific Salmon and had funding support from the Bonneville Power Administration as part of the 1995-2011 Canada-USA Salmon Shelf Survival Study. The intent of that study was to monitor and evaluate the effects of ocean conditions on the distribution, migration, growth, and survival of Pacific salmon during their first ocean year, and estimate the subsequent impacts on abundance of Chinook salmon adults returning to the Columbia River system.

Seasonal and annual multi-model ensembles of projected change (also known as anomalies) in sea ice concentration based on an ensemble of twenty-eight Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) global climate models are available for 1900-2100. Sea ice concentration is represented as the percentage (%) of grid cell area. Therefore, projected change in sea ice concentration is with respect to the reference period of 1986-2005 and expressed as a percentage (%). The 5th, 25th, 50th, 75th and 95th percentiles of the ensembles of sea ice concentration change are available for the historical time period, 1900-2005, and for emission scenarios, RCP2.6, RCP4.5 and RCP8.5, for 2006-2100. Twenty-year average changes in sea ice concentration (%) for four time periods (2021-2040; 2041-2060; 2061-2080; 2081-2100), with respect to the reference period of 1986-2005, for RCP2.6, RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 are also available in a range of formats. The median projected change across the ensemble of CMIP5 climate models is provided. Note: Projections among climate models can vary because of differences in their underlying representation of earth system processes. Thus, the use of a multi-model ensemble approach has been demonstrated in recent scientific literature to likely provide better projected climate change information.

Following the merger of the Duplessis and Manicouagan regions under the new name Côte-Nord, Quebec now has 21 tourist regions. The delimitation of regions is based on an unofficial division and is provided by Tourisme Québec. The boundaries were made using municipalities or MRCs.**This third party metadata element was translated using an automated translation tool (Amazon Translate).**

PURPOSE: To gather localized high-quality data for mapping eelgrass distribution in bays and estuaries in the Gulf Region of Atlantic Canada. DESCRIPTION: Between 2018 and 2023, a total of 48 coastal sites in New Brunswick (NB), Prince Edward Island (PE), and Nova Scotia (NS) have been fully processed for eelgrass presence/absence and depth information. An additional 18 sites from the same region and time period (2018–2023) have data collected but not yet fully processed for depth and eelgrass classification. These sites will be incorporated into the dataset as processing is completed. PARAMETERS COLLECTED: Geographic coordinates, timestamp, submerged aquatic vegetation presence. NOTES ON QUALITY CONTROL: BioSonics Visual Aquatic was used to process raw dt4 files by delineating the bottom and submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) heights. Initial delineation of the estuary bottom was performed using an automated algorithm within the software, followed by manual adjustments to refine the delineation as needed. An algorithm was then used to delineate vegetation, which was edited visually by referring to written ground-truthing notes and underwater photos taken with a GoPro underwater camera with GPS capacity. Expert advice within DFO was used to advise the analysts on best practices and subtleties in the echograms. All efforts were made to ensure vegetation mapped was eelgrass, but in some cases, such as where the acoustic response was not clear or ground-truthing notes were lacking, it is possible that other types of SAV were included. The processed data were exported from BioSonics Visual Aquatic aggregating sets of 10 pings that were in very close proximity. Grouped pings with a vegetation canopy height >= 0.1 m were assigned an eelgrass presence (i.e., "EG_Presence") value of "Y", while grouped pings with a height < 0.1 m were assigned a presence value of "N". SAMPLING METHODS: Acoustic data were collected during the summer or early fall season (varies depending on the site) by the Southern Gulf of St. Lawrence Coalition on Sustainability (Coalition-SGSL) in partnership with Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) Gulf Region. At some sites, the Province of New Brunswick's Department of Agriculture, Aquaculture and Fisheries (NBDAAF) also collected data using their boat. BioSonics MX Aquatic Habitat Echosounder units with a single beam (8.7°) 204.8kHz transducer (mounting height varied depending on the boat used) was used for data collection by all parties. Positioning was achieved using the BioSonics internal GPS through 2020, then subsequently an external GPS unit (Hemisphere S631 RTK GPS) was used to improve positioning from 1-2m accuracy to ~20cm when differential was obtained. BioSonics Visual Acquisition software was used to collect the data. USE LIMITATION: This product is provided as-is and has not been accuracy-assessed against other data. Since there were no transect-independent ground-truthing points surveyed, the accuracy of any interpolated surfaces created from this data cannot be known. Not for use without inclusion of full metadata. The data products are supplied "as they stand" and DFO does not guarantee the integrity, the completeness, or the accuracy. There were issues with the internal GPS of the BioSonics unit, and their impact on positional accuracy has yet to be determined. Beginning in 2021, an external, higher precision GPS unit was used to increase accuracy. Use of various boats and surveyors, as well as analysts, can introduce some inconsistencies in the data collection and analysis between sites and years. Site-specific characteristics such as mixed submerged aquatic vegetation can complicate mapping efforts. Shallow areas can also be challenging to delineate accurately since the bottom and/or the vegetation can extend higher than the mounted transducer. In these cases, a best estimate was used by the analyst. Weather conditions such as wind can affect the accuracy of the results, as the transponder may pitch and roll with the boat, while increased sediment in the water can interfere with the signal. Single-beam acoustic data has a very small focus footprint, which varies with depth, so it should not be considered a comprehensive bottom mapping tool. However, it does provide valuable point data that can indicate presence of vegetation, canopy height, relative depth, and ground-truthing for other mapping techniques (e.g. aerial or satellite imagery). For example, at 1 m depth, the 8.6 degree single-beam used for this work has a footprint of approximately 0.0177 square metres, and at 2 m depth that footprint becomes 0.0711 square metres.

In British Columbia, there are over 100 Livestock Districts, Bull Control Areas and Pound Districts established by regulation under the Livestock Act. Livestock Districts, with minor exceptions, are areas where livestock may run at large within the district boundaries. Bull Control Areas are areas within Livestock District, in which Bull Control Committees may make rules respecting the number, breed, breeding, quality and age of bulls allowed to run at large. Pound Districts are areas where keepers, peace officers and others may impound animals at large, and allow for the sale of unclaimed impounded animals and the reimbursement of the keeper. The regulations are published in the British Columbia Gazette Part II. The current Index of Current B.C. Regulations provides a complete list. Search Orders in Council from http://BCLaws.ca to view related Orders in Council including metes and bounds descriptions.