Mining District Boundaries for the Yukon as defined by the Yukon Placer Mining Act. The Yukon is divided into four districts with a mining recorder's office in each. Distributed from [GeoYukon](https://yukon.ca/geoyukon) by the [Government of Yukon](https://yukon.ca/maps) . Discover more digital map data and interactive maps from Yukon's digital map data collection. For more information: [geomatics.help@yukon.ca](mailto:geomatics.help@yukon.ca)

A vector representation of stream networks is a crucial dataset for the modelling the surface water and groundwater components of the hydrologic cycle. For many usages a crucial attribute of the drainage network is a digital topology and hierarchal stream order attribute (e.g., Strahler stream order). In Canada jurisdictional stream networks are available for the provinces and territories and nationally for Canada in the National Hydrological Network (NHN) dataset. Unfortunately, the NHN data lacks the same topological and attribute information that is available for numerous provinces due to standardization for the entire country. For Canada1Water it was also necessary to have a harmonized dataset with the United States, for both the southern transboundary watersheds and the Alaskan watersheds. This report documents the processes completed to upgrade the topological and graph network support for NHN and provide continuous connectivity with US datasets. It also highlights and corrects a number of stream density and stream order issues that occur within Canada across provincial and territorial borders and NTS tiles. All vector processing was completed in RivEX software extension for ArcMap. Following complete topological correction stream classification was assigned and a table of the node graph network developed. Additional work was then completed to normalize stream density particularly amongst low-order streams between British Columbia and the Yukon and amongst local NTS tiles in Quebec and Ontario. Corrected NHN Strahler stream order assignment was validated against a number of provincial and watershed datasets, all of which already have Strahler stream order attributed. These datasets are the same underlying digitized vector data, so there are no differences in node or polyline positions. Strahler stream order assignment validation was only done by visual comparison as due to differences in vector segments a statistical comparison is complicated. The transboundary integrated C1W stream network with complete classification provides a seamless national dataset to support transdisciplinary studies (fisheries, wildlife, health, pesticide and nutrient issues, mining impact, ecosystem restoration, numeric modelling) that involve a knowledge of stream distribution and ranking.

Likelihood of presence of Snow Crab in the Bay of Fundy and Port Hawkesbury areas. The Coastal Oceanography and Ecosystem Research section (DFO Science) reviewed science sources and local knowledge sources to estimate where Snow Crab are seasonally present and delineate these areas. As of March 2017, this dataset delineates the presence of snow crab in the Bay of Fundy and Port Hawkesbury areas of Nova Scotia designated within the Area Response Planning (ARP), identified under the World Class Tanker Safety System (WCTSS) initiative, based on the Transport Canada's Response Organizations Standards. A version of this dataset was created for the National Environmental Emergency Center (NEEC) following their data model and is available for download in the Resources section. Cite this data as: Lazin, G., Hamer, A.,Corrigan, S., Bower, B., and Harvey, C. Data of: Likelihood of presence of Snow Crab in Area Response Planning pilot areas. Published: June 2018. Coastal Ecosystems Science Division, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, St. Andrews, N.B. https://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/edb15c7b-d901-46b0-a460-1aca22c013ea

Likelihood of Presence of Harbour Porpoise in the Bay of Fundy and Port Hawkesbury Area Response Plan. The Coastal Oceanography and Ecosystem Research section (DFO Science) reviewed reported opportunistic whale sightings and local knowledge sources to estimate areas where Harbour Porpoises are seasonally present and delineate these areas. A version of this dataset was created for the National Environmental Emergency Center (NEEC) following their data model and is available for download in the Resources section. Cite this data as: Lazin, G., Hamer, A.,Corrigan, S., Bower, B., and Harvey, C. Data of: Likelihood of Presence of Harbour Porpoise in Area Response Planning Pilot Areas. Published: June 2018. Coastal Ecosystems Science Division, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, St. Andrews, N.B. https://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/58ea48ab-f052-48ab-9c18-4353e51b8bea

“Pacific Rim National Park Reserve - Total GHG Emissions” datasets consist of estimates of GHG emissions (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O)) in carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2e) from forested ecosystems in 1990 to 2020 (tonnes carbon dioxide equivalent per hectare). Total GHG emissions for 31 national parks were estimated using the Generic Carbon Budget Model (GCBM), a spatially explicit carbon budget model developed by Canadian Forest Service which uses forest inventory, disturbance, and mean annual temperature data along with yield data to estimate growth and merchantable volume for dominant tree species. Species- and Ecozone-specific equations are then used to convert merchantable volume to aboveground and belowground biomass carbon. The GCBM simulates carbon dynamics to produce spatially explicit estimations of carbon stocks and fluxes. The model simulates and tracks carbon stocks, transfers between Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)-defined pools, and other metrics including net ecosystem production, net biome production, and emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O) in annual time steps. The stocks and fluxes are also tracked by disturbance event (e.g., forest fires). Total GHG emissions include those from natural processes like respiration and decomposition and those due to natural and anthropogenic disturbances, including wildfires, prescribed burns, and insect outbreaks. These were calculated as the sum of CO2, CH4, and N2O emission estimates in tonnes carbon (tonnes C) generated by the GCBM. Emissions estimates were then converted to carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2e) using the 100-year Global Warming Potential (IPCC Fourth Assessment Report) factors for CH4 (25) and N2O (298). These products have a spatial resolution of 30m. This information is part of the Parks Canada Carbon Atlas Series. To obtain a copy of this report, please contact changementclimatique-climatechange@pc.gc.ca. When using this data, please cite as follows: Sharma, T., Kurz, W.A., Fellows, M., MacDonald, A.L., Richards, J., Chisholm, C., Seutin, G., Richardson, K., Keenleyside, K. (2023). Parks Canada Carbon Atlas Series: Carbon Dynamics in the Forests of Canada’s National Parks. Scientific Report. Parks Canada Agency, Gatineau, QC, Canada, 104 p.

Delimitation of the urban perimeters of the City of Rimouski**This third party metadata element was translated using an automated translation tool (Amazon Translate).**

The purpose of this dataset is to provide quantitative analysis on specific commodities, offering insights into: - The total amount of specific commodities, e.g., Gold, in Yukon's hard rock deposits. - The highest-grade and largest deposits in Yukon. - The distribution of mineral resources within multiple zones in a deposit. - Source reports, direct links, and confidence levels for each mineral resource statement. - Differentiation between 43-101, JORC, and historical estimates. The resources in this dataset have been summarized and averaged to show the total geologic resource for a property or zone. For the exact numbers, please refer to the NI 43-101 compliant resource statement. +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | Field\ | Description\ | | \ | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | Property\ | Property for which deposit | | \ | resource was calculated.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | Zone\ | Zone for which deposit resource | | \ | was calculated.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | 43-101 Compliant\ | If the resource calculation is NI | | \ | 43-101 compliant, JORC compliant, | | | or historic.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | Commodities\ | The types of commodities | | \ | contained in the resource | | | calculation, order is | | | alphabetic.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | Categories\ | The resource categories used to | | \ | create the calculation. This | | | indicates the level of certainty | | | of the calculation.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | Resource / Reserve\ | If the resource calculation is | | \ | considered to be a reserve or | | | resource. A reserve factors | | | economic factors an | | | extractability of the deposit | | | into account.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | Tonnage\ | The total tonnage of the deposit\ | | \ | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_AU_GT\ | The average grade of gold in the | | \ | deposit, in grams per metric | | | tonne.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_AU_OZ\ | The total contained gold, in troy | | \ | ounces.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_AG_GT\ | The average grade of silver in | | \ | the deposit, in grams per metric | | | tonne.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_AG_OZ\ | The total contained silver, in | | \ | troy ounces.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_CU_PCT\ | The average grade of copper in | | \ | the deposit, in percentage.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_CU_LBS\ | The total contained gold, in | | \ | pounds.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_MO_PCT\ | The average grade of molybdenum | | \ | in the deposit, in percentage.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_MO_LBS\ | The total contained molybdenum, | | \ | in pounds.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_PB_PCT\ | The average grade of lead in the | | \ | deposit, in percentage.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_PB_LBS\ | The total contained lead, in | | \ | pounds.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_ZN_PCT\ | The average grade of zinc in the | | \ | deposit, in percentage.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_ZN_LBS\ | The total contained zinc, in | | \ | pounds\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_NI_PCT\ | The average grade of nickel in | | \ | the deposit, in percentage.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_NI_LBS\ | The total contained nickel, in | | \ | pounds.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_CO_PCT\ | The average grade of cobalt in | | \ | the deposit, in percentage.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_CO_LBS\ | The total contained cobalt, in | | \ | pounds.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_WO3_PCT\ | The average grade of tungsten | | \ | trioxide in the deposit, in | | | percentage.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_WO3_LBS\ | The total contained tungsten | | \ | trioxide, in pounds.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_SN_PCT\ | The average grade of tin in the | | \ | deposit, in percentage.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_SN_LBS\ | The total contained tin, in | | \ | pounds.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_SB_PCT\ | The average grade of antimony in | | \ | the deposit, in percentage.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_SB_LBS\ | The total contained antimony, in | | \ | pounds.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_FE_PCT\ | The average grade of iron in the | | \ | deposit, in percentage.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_FE_LBS\ | The total contained iron, in | | \ | pounds.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_PT_GT\ | The average grade of platinum in | | \ | the deposit, in grams per metric | | | tonne.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_PT_OZ\ | The total contained platinum, in | | \ | troy ounces.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_PD_GT\ | The average grade of palladium in | | \ | the deposit, in grams per metric | | | tonne.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_PD_OZ\ | The total contained palladium, in | | \ | troy ounces.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_BASO4_PCT\ | The average grade of barium | | \ | sulphate in the deposit, in | | | percentage.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_BASO4_TONNES\ | The total contained barium | | \ | sulphate, in pounds.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | REFERENCE_DATE\ | The date of the resource | | \ | calculation.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | URL\ | The link to the report or graphic | | \ | containing the resource | | | calculation.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | LATITUDE_DD\ | Y-Location, geographic center of | | \ | zones.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | LONGITUDE_DD\ | X-Location, geographic center of | | \ | zones.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ Distributed from [GeoYukon](https://yukon.ca:443/geoyukon) by the [Government of Yukon](https://yukon.ca:443/maps) . Discover more digital map data and interactive maps from Yukon's digital map data collection. For more information: [geomatics.help@yukon.ca](http://geomatics.help@yukon.ca:80/)

The well registry is a collection of records, including drilling logs and report documents, maintained by Yukon Government. These records provide information on the well construction details and subsurface conditions encountered at the time of drilling. Although some information in the dataset may be edited over time, the primary purpose is to document the original drilling conditions and not to provide an updated status of the well. There is no current overarching requirement for drillers or owners to submit well logs, therefore many have been provided on a voluntary basis. Therefore, this should not be expected to be a complete list of all wells across the territory. The water well dataset contains records obtained through the domestic water well program, voluntary submissions, and regulatory processes (licenses and permits). No identifiable personal information will be used or available on the public database. For further information about privacy and the protection of your personal information contact the Departmental Privacy Officer at (867) 667-5237. Distributed from [GeoYukon](https://yukon.ca/geoyukon) by the [Government of Yukon](https://yukon.ca/maps) . Discover more digital map data and interactive maps from Yukon's digital map data collection. For more information: [geomatics.help@yukon.ca](mailto:geomatics.help@yukon.ca)

Transport Features is composed of, among others, the National Road Network (NRN) and the National Railway Network (NRWN). Transport Features entities are: Nautical Facility, Track Segment, Track Junction, Railway Station, Track Crossing, Track Marker Post, Track Structure, Rail Ferry, Road Segment, Road Ferry, Road Junction, Blocked Passage, Toll Point, Aerial Cableway, Footbridge, Trail, Navigational Aid, Marina, and Runway. CanVec is a digital cartographic reference product of Natural Resources Canada (NRCan). It originates from the best available data sources covering Canadian territory, offers quality topographical information in vector format and complies with international geomatics standards. CanVec is a multi-source product coming mainly from the National Topographic Data Base (NTDB), the Mapping the North process conducted by the Canada Center for Mapping and Earth Observation (CCMEO), the Atlas of Canada data, the GeoBase initiative and the data update using satellite imagery coverage (e.g. Landsat 7, Spot, Radarsat, etc.). Distributed from [GeoYukon](https://yukon.ca/geoyukon) by the [Government of Yukon](https://yukon.ca/maps) . Discover more digital map data and interactive maps from Yukon's digital map data collection. For more information: [geomatics.help@yukon.ca](mailto:geomatics.help@yukon.ca)