Arctic SDI catalogue
Species
Type of resources
Available actions
Topics
Keywords
Contact for the resource
Provided by
Years
Formats
Representation types
Update frequencies
status
Service types
-
Distribution of species of community interest is a product of species and habitat surveillance under the obligations of Article 17 of EU Habitats Directive (92/43/ EEC). The species grid distribution (EEA reference grid 1 x 1 km) from data of species reports 2013 is presented. For detailed description and commentary see CHOBOT, K. (ed.) (2016). Druhy a přírodní stanoviště: Hodnotící zprávy o stavu v České republice. Praha: Agentura ochrany přírody a krajiny ČR a Ministerstvo životního prostředí. 226 s. ISBN 978-80-88076-20-9; NCA CR (AOPK ČR), 2013
-
Distribution of species of community interest is a product of species and habitat surveillance under the obligations of Article 17 of EU Habitats Directive (92/43/ EEC). The species grid distribution (EEA reference grid 1 x 1 km) from data of species reports 2013 is presented. For detailed description and commentary see CHOBOT, K. (ed.) (2016). Druhy a přírodní stanoviště: Hodnotící zprávy o stavu v České republice. Praha: Agentura ochrany přírody a krajiny ČR a Ministerstvo životního prostředí. 226 s. ISBN 978-80-88076-20-9; NCA CR (AOPK ČR), 2013
-
-
-
#abstract#
-
-
Data on trees belonging to the municipality, referred to as “public domain”: street and off-street trees (parks and public squares). Please note that in many cases, the City's data on the spatial location of trees may be inaccurate or out of date. In addition, in some boroughs, park trees are not indicated.**This third party metadata element was translated using an automated translation tool (Amazon Translate).**
-
Figure 4 -36 Freshwater fish sampling stations (A), ecoregion alpha diversity in each of the sampled ecoregions, as quantified by estimates of species richness from reference texts (Muus and Dahlstrøm 1971, Scott and Crossman 1973, Mecklenburg et al. 2002) and expert knowledge (academic and government scientists and traditional knowledge) (B), and ecoregion beta diversity (C) characterized according to components of beta diversity as either nestedness, turnover, no diversity (none, beta = 0), or similar nestedness and turnover (nestedness ~ turnover) in the circumpolar Arctic. Ecoregions are shown only where sampling stations occur. Fish sampling stations included in this study assessed complete fish assemblages at each location. State of the Arctic Freshwater Biodiversity Report - Chapter 4 - Page 74 - Figure 4-36
-
Assessment of monitoring implementation STATE OF THE ARCTIC MARINE BIODIVERSITY REPORT - <a href="https://arcticbiodiversity.is/findings/marine-mammals" target="_blank">Chapter 3</a> - Page 168 - Table 3.6.2
-
These shorebird surveys are conducted intermittently at a series of sites near the town of Tofino on the west coast of Vancouver Island, British Columbia, during northward (April to May) and southward migration (July to November). This survey includes all shorebird species. Surveyors used binoculars or a spotting scope to count the total number of shorebirds present within the natural boundaries of each survey site during the northward and/or southward migration periods. They used a boat to count birds within the entire area of Arakun Flats and Ducking Flats by traveling along the outer edge of the mudflats, and by stopping at standardized vantage points on land. They also used a boat to view as much area as possible within Maltby Slough, South Bay and Grice Bay from the openings to each of these bays. Surveyors walked the entire length of Chesterman Beach including the tombolo to Frank Island. Surveys were done at least twice a week at each site. Most boat surveys began at low tide when the mudflats were exposed and continued on the rising tide. Road accessible sites were usually surveyed during the hour before high tide or at high tide in 2011. Surveys were not conducted in weather that reduced visibility or made boat travel unsafe (heavy rain or high wind). Surveyors counted birds individually when they were within flocks of fewer than 200 birds. They estimated the size of larger flocks by counting 50 or 100 birds and then judged how many similar-sized groups made up the entire flock. Distant flocks were recorded as small or large shorebirds and assumed to have the same species composition as those closer to shore in 1995 or identified to species group and recorded as either “dowitchers” or “peeps” in 2011.