Type
 

dataset

1750 record(s)
 
Type of resources
Available actions
Categories
Topics
Keywords
Contact for the resource
Provided by
Years
Formats
Representation types
Update frequencies
status
Scale
Resolution
From 1 - 10 / 1750
  • Categories  

    Results of circumpolar assessment of lake zooplankton, including crustaceans and rotifers, and indicating (a) the location of zooplankton stations, underlain by circumpolar ecoregions; (b) ecoregions with many zooplankton stations, colored on the basis of alpha diversity rarefied to 25 stations; (c) all ecoregions with zooplankton stations, colored on the basis of alpha diversity rarefied to 10 stations; (d) ecoregions with at least two stations in a hydrobasin, colored on the basis of the dominant component of beta diversity (species turnover, nestedness, approximately equal contribution, or no diversity) when averaged across hydrobasins in each ecoregion. State of the Arctic Freshwater Biodiversity Report - Chapter 4- Page 59 - Figure 4-26

  • Categories  

    The pan-European High Resolution (HR) Image Mosaic 2015 provides up to two cloud-free HR optical coverage 1 of EEA39 countries including all islands of those countries plus French Overseas Departments (DOMs) acquired within predefined windows corresponding to the vegetation season in 2014-2015. Images are derived from the following satellite sensors: Resourcesat-1/2 SPOT-5 Sentinel-2 MSI The mosaic primarily is used as input data in the production of various Copernicus Land Monitoring Service (CLMS) datasets and services, such as land cover maps and high resolution layers on land cover characteristic and can be also useful for CLMS users for visualizations and classifications on land. The input imagery for the creation of the mosaic is provided by ESA. Due to license restrictions, HR Image Mosaic 2015 is only available as a web service (WMS), and not for data download.

  • Categories  

    Rarefied alpha diversity of river (a) diatoms from benthic samples, (b) benthic macroinvertebrates, and (c) fish in ecoregions across North America. State of the Arctic Freshwater Biodiversity Report - Chapter 5- Page 84 - Figure 5-1

  • Categories  

    Þekja [layer] j100v_vesturgosbelti_lindir_1utg_p: Lindir og hverir á Vesturgosbelti Íslands. [Springs and hotsprings of the Western Volcanic Zone of Iceland.] Gögnin sýna laug, hver, lindir, gufu- og leirhver. Gögn eru ekki flokkuð eftir ÍST120:2012 staðlinum. Hér er flokkun eða lýsing nýrra fitjueiginda: 'tegUppsprettuISOR': 2: 10–25°C (Laug) 3: 25–50°C (Laug) 4: 50–75°C (Laug) 5: 75–98°C (Laug) 6: 98–100°C (Hver) 20: Hrúður 30: Leir- og gufuhverir 7212: Lindir 10–100 l/s 7213: Lindir >100 l/s 7214: Lindasvæði 100–1000 l/s 7215: Lindasvæði >1000 l/s 'tegUppsprettuNI': 1: Lindir 4: Laug (10–98°C) 5: Hver (98–100°C) 6: Leir- og gufuhver 'vatnshiti': Hitastig vatnsins við lindina, mælieining: °C. 'gerdiISOR': Grágrýtislind/Grágrýtislindir: Lind/lindir í hrauni eldra en síðasta jökulskeið, Hraunalind/Hraunalindir: Lind/lindir í nútímahrauni, Móbergslind/Móbergslindir: Lind/lindir í móbergi, Sprungulind: Lind í sprungu. [This data includes cold, warm and hot springs, steam and mud springs. The data does not follow the ÍST120:2012 data standard. Explanation and classification of the new feature attributes: 'tegUppsprettuISOR': 2: 10–25°C (Warm spring) 3: 25–50°C (Warm spring) 4: 50–75°C (Warm spring) 5: 75–98°C (Warm spring) 6: 98–100°C (Boiling spring) 20: Hot spring deposits 30: Mud and steam spring 7212: Cold spring 10–100 l/s 7213: Cold spring >100 l/s 7214: Cold spring area 100–1000 l/s 7215: Cold spring area >1000 l/s 'tegUppsprettuNI': 1: Cold spring 4: Warm spring (10–98°C) 5: Boiling spring (98–100°C) 6: Mud and steam spring 'vatnshiti': Temperature of the spring in °C. 'gerdiISOR': Grágrýtislind/Grágrýtislindir: Spring(s) in 'grey basalt' lavas older than the last glacial, Hraunalind/Hraunalindir: Spring(s) in postglacial lavas, Móbergslind/Móbergslindir: Spring(s) in hyaloclastite tuff, Sprungulind: Spring in tectonic fissure.]

  • Categories  

    Riparian zones represent transitional areas occurring between land and freshwater ecosystems, characterised by distinctive hydrology, soil and biotic conditions and strongly influenced by the stream water. They provide a wide range of riparian functions (e.g. chemical filtration, flood control, bank stabilization, aquatic life and riparian wildlife support, etc.) and ecosystem services. The Riparian Zones products support the objectives of several European legal acts and policy initiatives, such as the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020, the Habitats and Birds Directives and the Water Framework Directive. This metadata refers to the Riparian Zones 2012 Land Cover/Land Use (LC/LU), which LC/LU classification is tailored to the needs of biodiversity monitoring in a variable buffer zone of selected rivers (Strahler levels 2-9 derived from EU-Hydro) for the reference year 2012. LC/LU is extracted from Very High Resolution (VHR) satellite data and other available data in a buffer zone of selected rivers for supporting biodiversity monitoring and mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services. The class definitions follow the pre-defined nomenclature on the basis of Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services (MAES) typology of ecosystems (Level 1 to Level 4) and CORINE Land Cover. The classification provides 55 distinct thematic classes with a Minimum Mapping Unit (MMU) of 0.5 ha and a Minimum Mapping Width (MMW) of 10 m. The nomenclature has been revised in 2020 with the aim to harmonize the products of the local components (mainly Riparian Zones and NATURA 2000 products) while maintaining user requirements for both products. A revised version of the Riparian Zones 2012 has been subsequently released in December 2021, together with the reference year 2018. The production of the Riparian Zones products was coordinated by the European Environment Agency in the frame of the EU Copernicus programme.

  • Categories  

    Macrofauna distribution of biomass (g wet fixed weight m-2) in the Barents Sea over three time periods: 1924-32 (Figure A), 1968-70 (Figure B) and 2003 (Figure C, constructed from original archive data, except for area south of 72° N where digitized megafaunal-data taken from Anisimova et al. (2010) was used. Adapted from Denisenko (2013). Blue boxes delineate the areas within which the zoobenthos biomass values were compared. STATE OF THE ARCTIC MARINE BIODIVERSITY REPORT - <a href="https://arcticbiodiversity.is/findings/benthos" target="_blank">Chapter 3</a> - Page 96- Figure 3.3.3

  • Categories  

    Routes used for hunting polar bear in Ittoqqoortoormiit, East Greenland before 1999 (red line), and in 2012 (yellow), 2013 (blue) and 2014 (green). STATE OF THE ARCTIC MARINE BIODIVERSITY REPORT - <a href="https://arcticbiodiversity.is/findings/marine-mammals" target="_blank">Chapter 3</a> - Page 159 - Box figure 3.6.1

  • Categories  

    Time series of relative proportions of Arctic and Atlantic Calanus species in Kongsfjorden (top) and Rijpfjorden (bottom) (Source: MOSJ, Norwegian Polar Institute). STATE OF THE ARCTIC MARINE BIODIVERSITY REPORT - <a href="https://arcticbiodiversity.is/findings/plankton" target="_blank">Chapter 3</a> - Page 77 - Figure 3.2.8

  • Categories  

    Þekja [layer] j100v_vesturgosbelti_berggrunnurNidurfoll_1utg_fl: Niðurföll í nútímahraunum. [Collapse pits in Holocene lavas.}

  • Categories  

    Temporal trends of arthropod abundance, 1996–2009. Estimated by the number of individuals caught per trap per day during the season from four different pitfall trap plots, each consisting of eight (1996–2006) or four (2007–2009) traps. Modified from Høye et al. 2013. STATE OF THE ARCTIC TERRESTRIAL BIODIVERSITY REPORT - Chapter 3 - Page 41 - Figure 3.16