All manmade waterbodies, including reservoirs and canals, for the province

Index of NTS 1:50,000 tiles Distributed from [GeoYukon](https://yukon.ca/geoyukon) by the [Government of Yukon](https://yukon.ca/maps) . Discover more digital map data and interactive maps from Yukon's digital map data collection. For more information: [geomatics.help@yukon.ca](mailto:geomatics.help@yukon.ca)

The purpose of this dataset is to provide quantitative analysis on specific commodities, offering insights into: - The total amount of specific commodities, e.g., Gold, in Yukon's hard rock deposits. - The highest-grade and largest deposits in Yukon. - The distribution of mineral resources within multiple zones in a deposit. - Source reports, direct links, and confidence levels for each mineral resource statement. - Differentiation between 43-101, JORC, and historical estimates. The resources in this dataset have been summarized and averaged to show the total geologic resource for a property or zone. For the exact numbers, please refer to the NI 43-101 compliant resource statement. +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | Field\ | Description\ | | \ | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | Property\ | Property for which deposit | | \ | resource was calculated.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | Zone\ | Zone for which deposit resource | | \ | was calculated.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | 43-101 Compliant\ | If the resource calculation is NI | | \ | 43-101 compliant, JORC compliant, | | | or historic.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | Commodities\ | The types of commodities | | \ | contained in the resource | | | calculation, order is | | | alphabetic.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | Categories\ | The resource categories used to | | \ | create the calculation. This | | | indicates the level of certainty | | | of the calculation.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | Resource / Reserve\ | If the resource calculation is | | \ | considered to be a reserve or | | | resource. A reserve factors | | | economic factors an | | | extractability of the deposit | | | into account.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | Tonnage\ | The total tonnage of the deposit\ | | \ | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_AU_GT\ | The average grade of gold in the | | \ | deposit, in grams per metric | | | tonne.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_AU_OZ\ | The total contained gold, in troy | | \ | ounces.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_AG_GT\ | The average grade of silver in | | \ | the deposit, in grams per metric | | | tonne.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_AG_OZ\ | The total contained silver, in | | \ | troy ounces.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_CU_PCT\ | The average grade of copper in | | \ | the deposit, in percentage.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_CU_LBS\ | The total contained gold, in | | \ | pounds.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_MO_PCT\ | The average grade of molybdenum | | \ | in the deposit, in percentage.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_MO_LBS\ | The total contained molybdenum, | | \ | in pounds.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_PB_PCT\ | The average grade of lead in the | | \ | deposit, in percentage.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_PB_LBS\ | The total contained lead, in | | \ | pounds.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_ZN_PCT\ | The average grade of zinc in the | | \ | deposit, in percentage.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_ZN_LBS\ | The total contained zinc, in | | \ | pounds\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_NI_PCT\ | The average grade of nickel in | | \ | the deposit, in percentage.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_NI_LBS\ | The total contained nickel, in | | \ | pounds.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_CO_PCT\ | The average grade of cobalt in | | \ | the deposit, in percentage.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_CO_LBS\ | The total contained cobalt, in | | \ | pounds.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_WO3_PCT\ | The average grade of tungsten | | \ | trioxide in the deposit, in | | | percentage.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_WO3_LBS\ | The total contained tungsten | | \ | trioxide, in pounds.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_SN_PCT\ | The average grade of tin in the | | \ | deposit, in percentage.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_SN_LBS\ | The total contained tin, in | | \ | pounds.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_SB_PCT\ | The average grade of antimony in | | \ | the deposit, in percentage.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_SB_LBS\ | The total contained antimony, in | | \ | pounds.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_FE_PCT\ | The average grade of iron in the | | \ | deposit, in percentage.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_FE_LBS\ | The total contained iron, in | | \ | pounds.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_PT_GT\ | The average grade of platinum in | | \ | the deposit, in grams per metric | | | tonne.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_PT_OZ\ | The total contained platinum, in | | \ | troy ounces.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_PD_GT\ | The average grade of palladium in | | \ | the deposit, in grams per metric | | | tonne.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_PD_OZ\ | The total contained palladium, in | | \ | troy ounces.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_BASO4_PCT\ | The average grade of barium | | \ | sulphate in the deposit, in | | | percentage.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_BASO4_TONNES\ | The total contained barium | | \ | sulphate, in pounds.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | REFERENCE_DATE\ | The date of the resource | | \ | calculation.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | URL\ | The link to the report or graphic | | \ | containing the resource | | | calculation.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | LATITUDE_DD\ | Y-Location, geographic center of | | \ | zones.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | LONGITUDE_DD\ | X-Location, geographic center of | | \ | zones.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ Distributed from [GeoYukon](https://yukon.ca:443/geoyukon) by the [Government of Yukon](https://yukon.ca:443/maps) . Discover more digital map data and interactive maps from Yukon's digital map data collection. For more information: [geomatics.help@yukon.ca](http://geomatics.help@yukon.ca:80/)

This compilation includes S (1251 analyses) and Pb (1622 analyses) isotopic data from nearly 450 mineral occurrences. Approximately 300 of these occurrences are located in Yukon and the remainder are located in British Columbia, Alaska or Northwest Territories. To facilitate data interpretation, a hierarchical deposit model scheme and mineralization age are ascribed to each occurrence. The Pb isotope portion of this compilation builds upon the compilation by Collin Godwin (1988) that was subsequently maintained by the University of British Columbia. Data from Alaska are primarily from the Gaccetta and Church (1989) compilation. This dataset is designed to be used in conjunction with a GIS platform and as such is presented here as a "flat file" (i.e., shapefile, geodatabase and text formats). The simple data structure allows for easier integration into GIS platforms and greater spatial querying of the data. This sulphide isotope database will be subject to periodic updates as new data are acquired through ongoing mapping, exploration and other research activities. Any errors, omissions or new data known to users should be reported to the Yukon Geological Survey. Your feedback contributes to improving the accuracy of the geoscience databases for Yukon. Contact: [Patrick.Sack@yukon.ca](mailto:Patrick.Sack@yukon.ca) ; [YGS-Bedrock@yukon.ca](YGS-Bedrock@yukon.ca) References: Gaccetta, J.D. and Church, S.E., 1989. Lead isotope database for sulfide occurrences from Alaska. USGS Open-File 89-688, p. 60. Godwin, C.I., Gabites, J.E. and Andrew, A., 1988. Leadtable: A Galena lead isotope database for the Canadian Cordillera, with a guide to its use by explorationists. British Columbia Mineral Resources Division, Geological Survey Branch, Paper 1988-4, p. 1-24. Distributed from [GeoYukon](https://yukon.ca/geoyukon) by the [Government of Yukon](https://yukon.ca/maps) . Discover more digital map data and interactive maps from Yukon's digital map data collection. For more information: [geomatics.help@yukon.ca](mailto:geomatics.help@yukon.ca)

This compilation includes published Nd, Hf, Sr and Pb (plus minor O, S and C) isotopic data from 1722 whole-rock powders and feldspar separates. About 1200 of these samples are located in Yukon and the remainder are located in British Columbia, Alaska or Northwest Territories. This compilation of whole-rock and feldspar isotopic data builds off of a compilation that Kristen Rasmussen (2013) did as part of her doctoral thesis at the University of British Columbia. To allow easier integration into a user's GIS platform, and for greater spatial querying of the data, the "database" is presented as a "flat file" (i.e., shapefile, geodatabase and text formats). This whole-rock and feldspar isotope database will be subject to periodic updates as new data are acquired through ongoing mapping, exploration and other research activities. Any errors, omissions or new data known to users should be reported to the Yukon Geological Survey. Your feedback contributes to improving the accuracy of the geoscience databases for Yukon. Contact: Patrick.Sack@yukon.ca ; [YGS-Bedrock@yukon.ca Reference: Rasmussen, K.L., 2013. The timing, composition and petrogenesis of syn- to post-accretionary magmatism in the northern Cordilleran miogeocline, eastern Yukon and southwest Northwest Territories. PhD thesis, University of British Columbia, 810 p. Distributed from [GeoYukon](https://yukon.ca/geoyukon) by the [Government of Yukon](https://yukon.ca/maps) . Discover more digital map data and interactive maps from Yukon's digital map data collection. For more information: [geomatics.help@yukon.ca](mailto:geomatics.help@yukon.ca) ](style="font-size:10pt")

The HOT2000 software contains monthly and annual climate data for 403 locations in Canada. Boundary lines for HOT2000 climate zones were defined through spatial interpolation of the annual Celsius heating degree-days for each weather station. In a number of instances, the positions of boundary lines may not be representative of the local climate conditions due to lack of appropriate climate data. Each HOT2000 climate zone contains one weather station to be used for all locations within the zone. Climate data represent 20-year averaged data from 1998 to 2017 for locations south of 58° latitude and 13-year averaged data from 2005 to 2017 for locations north of 58° latitude. Note that Whistler, BC uses 13 years of data. The following information is available in the climate map: o Location: the name of the weather station. o Region: the provincial or territorial location of the weather station. o Latitude: measured in degrees north of the equator. o Annual heating degree-days using a base of 18 °C. o Design heating dry bulb temperature (°C): the 2.5% January design temperature used to calculate the design heat loss for the house. o Design cooling dry bulb temperature (°C): the 2.5% July design temperature used to calculate the design cooling load for the house. o Design cooling wet bulb temperature (°C): the 2.5% July design temperature used to calculate the design cooling load for the house. The climate map is intended to be used by all users of the HOT2000 software under the EnerGuide Rating System, including energy advisors, service organizations, regulatory agencies, builders, utilities, and all levels of government. The weather locations and climate data are based on Environment and Climate Change Canada data, specifically the Canadian Weather Energy and Engineering Datasets (CWEEDS).

This dataset provides projected 30-year, 50-year, and 100-year return levels for harbours in British Columbia by 2050 and 2100 under an intermediate emission scenario SSP245, relative to the mean sea level over 1993-2020. The return levels are a combination of estimated present extreme sea levels and projected mean sea level rise. The present extreme sea levels are derived from hourly coastal sea levels for the period from 1993 to 2020, simulated using a high-resolution Northeast Pacific Ocean Model (NEPOM). The projected mean sea level rise is derived from the regional mean sea level rise data of the IPCC 6th Assessment Report under SSP245, adjusted for the local vertical land motion.

Glaciers and ice masses for the province, derived from aerial imagery flown in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Please refer to the [Glaciers](https://catalogue.data.gov.bc.ca/dataset/glaciers) dataset for recent glacier extents in British Columbia, and [Historical Glaciers](https://catalogue.data.gov.bc.ca/dataset/historical-glaciers) for a comparable historic view.

Polygons delimiting the watershed group boundary, which is a collections of drainage areas. In-land groups will contain a single polygon, coastal groups may contain multiple polygons (one for each island)

Canada’s NFI survey was designed to provide an unbiased probability sample of Canada’s forests for long-term strategic monitoring purposes. The target population is Canada’s entire non-Arctic land area. A National Terrestrial Monitoring Framework (NTMF) was created by establishing a systematic 4 km by 4 km sampling grid over all of Canada from a random offshore point. Prior to T0, NFI partners determined that the NFI program would be able to affordably achieve its mission by establishing a 2 km by 2 km (400 ha) “photo plot” at every fifth sampling point on the NTMF (i.e. every 20 km), thereby providing a one percent sample of the target population. This sampling intensity was considered sufficient for national reporting and possible to sustain over the long term with anticipated funding. Photo plots were established across Canada during 2000-2006 (T0). There are 26,139 photo plot survey locations on the 20 km by 20 km grid, of which 18,570 lie inside the target population area. For each photo plot, information is collected on land cover, land use, ownership and protection status. NFI photo plot survey data are stratified by “NFI Unit” for standard estimation and reporting purposes. NFI Units were created by the geographic intersection of Canada’s 10 provinces, 3 territories and 12 non-Arctic terrestrial ecozones. Estimates produced for NFI Units are rolled up to produce standard reports for ecozones, jurisdictions (provinces and territories) and Canada. Some NFI Units are too small to produce robust estimates for with the current sampling intensity, so NFI Unit estimates are not publicly reported. Prince Edward Island (PEI) Atlantic Maritime, for example, is PEI’s only NFI Unit and it is small (1% sampling intensity achieved with only 19 photo plots), so the NFI avoids publishing provincial reports. Information consumers are encouraged to use official statistics produced by provincial and territorial governments for the forests in their jurisdictions. Most provinces are large, however, and the current NFI sampling intensity is sufficient for producing robust NFI reports for those jurisdictions. Special estimation reports can be produced using different ecological or administrative strata, such as the Boreal Zone, or the Managed Forest. NFI photo plots are surveyed on a ten-year cycle. During first re-measurement (T1; 2008-2017), survey intensity was reduced to one photo plot every 40 km across northern Canada (Figure 3) because of budget limitations. The T2 survey (2018-2027) is currently underway.