cl_maintenanceAndUpdateFrequency

RI_540

2357 record(s)
 
Type of resources
Available actions
Topics
Keywords
Contact for the resource
Provided by
Formats
Representation types
Update frequencies
status
Scale
Resolution
From 1 - 10 / 2357
  • Categories  

    Delimitation of the permanent agricultural zone and agricultural inclusions, as illustrated in “Map 2-26: Permanent agricultural zone and agricultural inclusions” of the revised land use and development plan of the City of Laval**This third party metadata element was translated using an automated translation tool (Amazon Translate).**

  • Categories  

    The mako shark (Isurus oxyrinchus), is a species found in Atlantic Canadian waters which is encountered in commercial and recreational fisheries. Pop-up Satellite Archival Tags (PSAT) from Wildlife Computers were applied to mako sharks from 2011 to 2013 to collect data on depth (pressure), temperature and ambient light level (for position estimation). Deployments were conducted in Canada on commercial vessels, typically in summer and fall from July to October. Two types of tag models were deployed: Mk10 (N=28), and MiniPAT (N=9) and 28 of 37 tags reported (one female shark was recaptured). The mako sharks tagged ranged in size from 80 cm to 229 cm Fork Length (curved); 13 were female, 17 were male, and 7 were unknown sex. Time at liberty ranged from 0 – 185 days and 6 tags remained on for the programmed duration. Raw data transmitted from the PSAT’s after release was processed through Wildlife Computers software (GPE3) to get summary files, assuming a maximum swimming speed of 2m/s, NOAA OI SST V2 High Resolution data set for SST reference and ETOPO1-Bedrock dataset for bathymetry reference. The maximum likelihood position estimates are available in .csv and .kmz format and depth and temperature profiles are also in .csv format. Other tag outputs as well as metadata from the deployments can be obtained upon request from: warren.joyce@dfo-mpo.gc.ca or heather.bowlby@dfo-mpo.gc.ca.

  • Categories  

    Atlantic salmon postsmolts were surveyed via surface trawling during 2001 and 2003. These data were provided to the Coastal Oceanography and Ecosystem Research section of Fisheries and Oceans Canada. These data, and information from subsequent tagging studies were considered to estimate the likelihood of presence of Atlantic salmon within the Area Response Plan regions. Atlantic salmon presence varies seasonally and this spatial information should be used in conjunction with the temporal information in the attribute table. A version of this dataset was created for the National Environmental Emergency Center (NEEC) following their data model and is available for download in the Resources section. Cite this data as: Lazin, G., Hamer, A.,Corrigan, S., Bower, B., and Harvey, C. Data of: Likelihood of presence of Atlantic Salmon in Area Response Planning pilot areas. Published: June 2018. Coastal Ecosystems Science Division, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, St. Andrews, N.B. https://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/436cdf90-9d6b-4784-938b-feec48844a67

  • Categories  

    Location of the emptying site for recreational vehicles in Repentigny.**This third party metadata element was translated using an automated translation tool (Amazon Translate).**

  • Categories  

    A feature is a representation of a real world object, such as a lake, stream, dam or rapid. There are three hydrographic feature classes:  points, lines and polys.   All may impede or be hazardous to waterflow and/or navigation on a watercourse or waterbody. This data shows natural and manmade poly features.  Examples include: * break walls * dams * rapids * shipwrecks [Technical Bulletin: Data migrated to new Ontario Hydro Network (OHN) - Hydrographic Feature Data Classes (PDF)](http://geo2.scholarsportal.info/proxy.html?http:__maps.scholarsportal.info/files/PDFS/public/OGDE/OHN/TB-OHN-PostMigration_101112.pdf)

  • Categories  

    The HOT2000 software contains monthly and annual climate data for 403 locations in Canada. Boundary lines for HOT2000 climate zones were defined through spatial interpolation of the annual Celsius heating degree-days for each weather station. In a number of instances, the positions of boundary lines may not be representative of the local climate conditions due to lack of appropriate climate data. Each HOT2000 climate zone contains one weather station to be used for all locations within the zone. Climate data represent 20-year averaged data from 1998 to 2017 for locations south of 58° latitude and 13-year averaged data from 2005 to 2017 for locations north of 58° latitude. Note that Whistler, BC uses 13 years of data. The following information is available in the climate map: o Location: the name of the weather station. o Region: the provincial or territorial location of the weather station. o Latitude: measured in degrees north of the equator. o Annual heating degree-days using a base of 18 °C. o Design heating dry bulb temperature (°C): the 2.5% January design temperature used to calculate the design heat loss for the house. o Design cooling dry bulb temperature (°C): the 2.5% July design temperature used to calculate the design cooling load for the house. o Design cooling wet bulb temperature (°C): the 2.5% July design temperature used to calculate the design cooling load for the house. The climate map is intended to be used by all users of the HOT2000 software under the EnerGuide Rating System, including energy advisors, service organizations, regulatory agencies, builders, utilities, and all levels of government. The weather locations and climate data are based on Environment and Climate Change Canada data, specifically the Canadian Weather Energy and Engineering Datasets (CWEEDS).

  • Categories  

    The purpose of this dataset is to provide quantitative analysis on specific commodities, offering insights into: - The total amount of specific commodities, e.g., Gold, in Yukon's hard rock deposits. - The highest-grade and largest deposits in Yukon. - The distribution of mineral resources within multiple zones in a deposit. - Source reports, direct links, and confidence levels for each mineral resource statement. - Differentiation between 43-101, JORC, and historical estimates. The resources in this dataset have been summarized and averaged to show the total geologic resource for a property or zone. For the exact numbers, please refer to the NI 43-101 compliant resource statement. +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | Field\ | Description\ | | \ | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | Property\ | Property for which deposit | | \ | resource was calculated.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | Zone\ | Zone for which deposit resource | | \ | was calculated.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | 43-101 Compliant\ | If the resource calculation is NI | | \ | 43-101 compliant, JORC compliant, | | | or historic.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | Commodities\ | The types of commodities | | \ | contained in the resource | | | calculation, order is | | | alphabetic.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | Categories\ | The resource categories used to | | \ | create the calculation. This | | | indicates the level of certainty | | | of the calculation.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | Resource / Reserve\ | If the resource calculation is | | \ | considered to be a reserve or | | | resource. A reserve factors | | | economic factors an | | | extractability of the deposit | | | into account.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | Tonnage\ | The total tonnage of the deposit\ | | \ | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_AU_GT\ | The average grade of gold in the | | \ | deposit, in grams per metric | | | tonne.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_AU_OZ\ | The total contained gold, in troy | | \ | ounces.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_AG_GT\ | The average grade of silver in | | \ | the deposit, in grams per metric | | | tonne.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_AG_OZ\ | The total contained silver, in | | \ | troy ounces.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_CU_PCT\ | The average grade of copper in | | \ | the deposit, in percentage.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_CU_LBS\ | The total contained gold, in | | \ | pounds.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_MO_PCT\ | The average grade of molybdenum | | \ | in the deposit, in percentage.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_MO_LBS\ | The total contained molybdenum, | | \ | in pounds.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_PB_PCT\ | The average grade of lead in the | | \ | deposit, in percentage.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_PB_LBS\ | The total contained lead, in | | \ | pounds.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_ZN_PCT\ | The average grade of zinc in the | | \ | deposit, in percentage.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_ZN_LBS\ | The total contained zinc, in | | \ | pounds\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_NI_PCT\ | The average grade of nickel in | | \ | the deposit, in percentage.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_NI_LBS\ | The total contained nickel, in | | \ | pounds.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_CO_PCT\ | The average grade of cobalt in | | \ | the deposit, in percentage.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_CO_LBS\ | The total contained cobalt, in | | \ | pounds.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_WO3_PCT\ | The average grade of tungsten | | \ | trioxide in the deposit, in | | | percentage.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_WO3_LBS\ | The total contained tungsten | | \ | trioxide, in pounds.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_SN_PCT\ | The average grade of tin in the | | \ | deposit, in percentage.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_SN_LBS\ | The total contained tin, in | | \ | pounds.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_SB_PCT\ | The average grade of antimony in | | \ | the deposit, in percentage.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_SB_LBS\ | The total contained antimony, in | | \ | pounds.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_FE_PCT\ | The average grade of iron in the | | \ | deposit, in percentage.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_FE_LBS\ | The total contained iron, in | | \ | pounds.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_PT_GT\ | The average grade of platinum in | | \ | the deposit, in grams per metric | | | tonne.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_PT_OZ\ | The total contained platinum, in | | \ | troy ounces.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_PD_GT\ | The average grade of palladium in | | \ | the deposit, in grams per metric | | | tonne.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_PD_OZ\ | The total contained palladium, in | | \ | troy ounces.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_BASO4_PCT\ | The average grade of barium | | \ | sulphate in the deposit, in | | | percentage.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_BASO4_TONNES\ | The total contained barium | | \ | sulphate, in pounds.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | REFERENCE_DATE\ | The date of the resource | | \ | calculation.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | URL\ | The link to the report or graphic | | \ | containing the resource | | | calculation.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | LATITUDE_DD\ | Y-Location, geographic center of | | \ | zones.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | LONGITUDE_DD\ | X-Location, geographic center of | | \ | zones.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ Distributed from [GeoYukon](https://yukon.ca:443/geoyukon) by the [Government of Yukon](https://yukon.ca:443/maps) . Discover more digital map data and interactive maps from Yukon's digital map data collection. For more information: [geomatics.help@yukon.ca](http://geomatics.help@yukon.ca:80/)

  • Categories  

    The Yukon is underlain by a great variety of rock types ranging in age from Early Proterozoic to Recent. The various rock types are characterized by different magnetic intensity and this map show those variations at the regional scale, with highly magnetic rocks represented by warm colours and non-magnetic rocks shown in cool colours. The First Vertical Derivative magnetic map highlights the magnetic intensity of near-surface features in the Earth's crust. This magnetic compilation was extracted from the compilation of Oneschuk et al. (2019). The data was gridded at 50 m. Magnetic data for Yukon can be obtained from: [http://gdrdap.agg.nrcan.gc.ca/](http://gdrdap.agg.nrcan.gc.ca/) Distributed from [GeoYukon](https://yukon.ca/geoyukon) by the [Government of Yukon](https://yukon.ca/maps) . Discover more digital map data and interactive maps from Yukon's digital map data collection. For more information: [geomatics.help@yukon.ca](mailto:geomatics.help@yukon.ca)

  • Categories  

    The purpose of this dataset is to provide quantitative analysis on specific commodities, offering insights into: - The total amount of specific commodities, e.g., Gold, in Yukon's hard rock deposits. - The highest-grade and largest deposits in Yukon. - The distribution of mineral resources within multiple zones in a deposit. - Source reports, direct links, and confidence levels for each mineral resource statement. - Differentiation between 43-101, JORC, and historical estimates. The resources in this dataset have been summarized and averaged to show the total geologic resource for a property or zone. For the exact numbers, please refer to the NI 43-101 compliant resource statement. +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | Field\ | Description\ | | \ | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | Property\ | Property for which deposit | | \ | resource was calculated.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | Zone\ | Zone for which deposit resource | | \ | was calculated.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | 43-101 Compliant\ | If the resource calculation is NI | | \ | 43-101 compliant, JORC compliant, | | | or historic.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | Commodities\ | The types of commodities | | \ | contained in the resource | | | calculation, order is | | | alphabetic.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | Categories\ | The resource categories used to | | \ | create the calculation. This | | | indicates the level of certainty | | | of the calculation.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | Resource / Reserve\ | If the resource calculation is | | \ | considered to be a reserve or | | | resource. A reserve factors | | | economic factors an | | | extractability of the deposit | | | into account.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | Tonnage\ | The total tonnage of the deposit\ | | \ | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_AU_GT\ | The average grade of gold in the | | \ | deposit, in grams per metric | | | tonne.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_AU_OZ\ | The total contained gold, in troy | | \ | ounces.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_AG_GT\ | The average grade of silver in | | \ | the deposit, in grams per metric | | | tonne.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_AG_OZ\ | The total contained silver, in | | \ | troy ounces.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_CU_PCT\ | The average grade of copper in | | \ | the deposit, in percentage.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_CU_LBS\ | The total contained gold, in | | \ | pounds.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_MO_PCT\ | The average grade of molybdenum | | \ | in the deposit, in percentage.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_MO_LBS\ | The total contained molybdenum, | | \ | in pounds.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_PB_PCT\ | The average grade of lead in the | | \ | deposit, in percentage.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_PB_LBS\ | The total contained lead, in | | \ | pounds.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_ZN_PCT\ | The average grade of zinc in the | | \ | deposit, in percentage.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_ZN_LBS\ | The total contained zinc, in | | \ | pounds\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_NI_PCT\ | The average grade of nickel in | | \ | the deposit, in percentage.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_NI_LBS\ | The total contained nickel, in | | \ | pounds.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_CO_PCT\ | The average grade of cobalt in | | \ | the deposit, in percentage.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_CO_LBS\ | The total contained cobalt, in | | \ | pounds.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_WO3_PCT\ | The average grade of tungsten | | \ | trioxide in the deposit, in | | | percentage.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_WO3_LBS\ | The total contained tungsten | | \ | trioxide, in pounds.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_SN_PCT\ | The average grade of tin in the | | \ | deposit, in percentage.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_SN_LBS\ | The total contained tin, in | | \ | pounds.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_SB_PCT\ | The average grade of antimony in | | \ | the deposit, in percentage.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_SB_LBS\ | The total contained antimony, in | | \ | pounds.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_FE_PCT\ | The average grade of iron in the | | \ | deposit, in percentage.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_FE_LBS\ | The total contained iron, in | | \ | pounds.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_PT_GT\ | The average grade of platinum in | | \ | the deposit, in grams per metric | | | tonne.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_PT_OZ\ | The total contained platinum, in | | \ | troy ounces.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_PD_GT\ | The average grade of palladium in | | \ | the deposit, in grams per metric | | | tonne.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_PD_OZ\ | The total contained palladium, in | | \ | troy ounces.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | AVG_BASO4_PCT\ | The average grade of barium | | \ | sulphate in the deposit, in | | | percentage.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | TOTAL_BASO4_TONNES\ | The total contained barium | | \ | sulphate, in pounds.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | REFERENCE_DATE\ | The date of the resource | | \ | calculation.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | URL\ | The link to the report or graphic | | \ | containing the resource | | | calculation.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | LATITUDE_DD\ | Y-Location, geographic center of | | \ | zones.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | LONGITUDE_DD\ | X-Location, geographic center of | | \ | zones.\ | | | \ | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ Distributed from [GeoYukon](https://yukon.ca:443/geoyukon)(target="_blank" style="text-decoration:underline;" rel="nofollow ugc noopener noreferrer") by the [Government of Yukon](https://yukon.ca:443/maps)(target="_blank" style="text-decoration:underline;" rel="nofollow ugc noopener noreferrer") . Discover more digital map data and interactive maps from Yukon's digital map data collection. For more information: [geomatics.help@yukon.ca](http://geomatics.help@yukon.ca:80/)(target="_blank" style="text-decoration:underline;" rel="nofollow ugc noopener noreferrer")

  • Categories  

    The framework of the Cordilleran orogen of northwestern North America is commonly depicted as a 'collage' of terranes - crustal blocks containing records of a variety of geodynamic environments including continental fragments, pieces of island arc crust and oceanic crust. The series of maps available here are derived from a GIS compilation of terranes based on the map first published by Colpron et al. (2007) and more recently revised by Nelson et al. (2013). These maps are presented here in digital formats including ArcGIS file geodatabase (.gdb), shapefiles (.shp and related files), Google Earth (.kmz), as well as graphic files (.pdf). The GIS data includes terrane polygons and selected major Late Cretaceous and Tertiary strike-slip faults. Graphic PDF files derived from the GIS compilation were prepared for the Northern Cordillera (Alaska, Yukon and BC), the Canadian Cordillera (BC and Yukon), Yukon, and British Columbia. These maps are intended for page-size display (\~1:5,000,000 and smaller). Polygons are accurate to \~1 km for Yukon and BC, \~5 km for Alaska. More detailed geological data are available from both BCGC, USGS and YGS websites. Descriptions of the terranes, their tectonic evolution and metallogeny can be found in Colpron et al. (2007), Nelson and Colpron (2007), Colpron and Nelson (2009), Nelson et al. (2013) and references therein. The terrane map project is a collaborative effort of the BC Geological Survey and the Yukon Geological Survey. Distributed from [GeoYukon](https://yukon.ca/geoyukon) by the [Government of Yukon](https://yukon.ca/maps) . Discover more digital map data and interactive maps from Yukon's digital map data collection. For more information: [geomatics.help@yukon.ca](mailto:geomatics.help@yukon.ca)